I’ll go ahead and say it: Common LISP. Cliche, but I really believe it.
ETA: also, human beings will still program, if only for fun and mental exercise. There will also continue to be an (ever shrinking) elite who can continue to be most productive by collaborating with AI rather than just asking it for things.
If I could visualise the whole stack I would just replicate it all in straight machine code for efficiency. Good luck anybody trying to code review it though.
If true AI ever arrives, it will determine what it wants to accomplish and then, if computers or other machines are needed to accomplish any of the steps of a solution, imo AI will communicate directly with the machine in the machine's natural language (machine code in today's machines).
You are thinking like a human when you think true AI would need a "language". True AI will be fully capable of "thinking" in the natural language of the machines at the time (quantum machine code for example) without needing any higher languages that then get translated into machine code. IMO, those steps are needed by humans, but not by a true AI.
Did you ask Chatgpt? Who else better to ask questions about AI than AI?
The prompts I have come up with all result in Python being it's preferred programming language.
it's just done a few Bootcamps like all the Hotel Managers, Bar Tenders, Postal workers and Non Technical Project Managers did in the Pandemics
An AI capable of replacing all human software engineers will be capable of devising various superior programming languages. It will use them instead.
Why would it not create its own if it's that good?
I’ll go ahead and say it: Common LISP. Cliche, but I really believe it.
ETA: also, human beings will still program, if only for fun and mental exercise. There will also continue to be an (ever shrinking) elite who can continue to be most productive by collaborating with AI rather than just asking it for things.
If I could visualise the whole stack I would just replicate it all in straight machine code for efficiency. Good luck anybody trying to code review it though.
You are clearly talking about LLMs, not AI.
If true AI ever arrives, it will determine what it wants to accomplish and then, if computers or other machines are needed to accomplish any of the steps of a solution, imo AI will communicate directly with the machine in the machine's natural language (machine code in today's machines).
You are thinking like a human when you think true AI would need a "language". True AI will be fully capable of "thinking" in the natural language of the machines at the time (quantum machine code for example) without needing any higher languages that then get translated into machine code. IMO, those steps are needed by humans, but not by a true AI.
Yeah, your observation is correct, I was referring to a so-called generative AI or LLMs. I should’ve phrased that properly.